|
Mathematics of Wasted Labour
With kind permission from J.W. Smith, a part of the
conclusion to Part I of World's Wasted Wealth II (Institute for Economic
Democracy, 1994) has been reproduced here.
That part is titled The Mathematics of Wasted Labour.
In the preceding chapters of Part I that leads to this part of the
conclusion, details on how he arrives at those estimates of wasted labour in
different industries are described.
It is a vivid example of wasted and unnecessary labour using the United
States as the case study.
While the book was written back in 1994 and the numbers, facts and estimates
are hence based on data from the early 1990s, the pattern and examples shown
here are still very valid.
We believe that the numbers are not so changed in just a few years to
invalidate the principle and overall results here of millions of wasted jobs
and the benefits of sharing the remaining productive jobs.
At the same time however, a request is made for researchers and students out
there to be able to provide more updated numbers.
Chapter titles that are referenced within the text are other
chapters from the above-mentioned book.
THE MATHEMATICS OF WASTED LABOUR
The current unemployed or wasted labour available for productive work, if
society restructured to take full advantage of the efficiencies of
technology, is an estimated:
2.047 million people in the insurance industry (2.3 million less 11 percent
calculated in the surplus guard labour [administrators] described by
professors Bowles, Gordon, and Weisskopf);
1.5 million people in the legal industry;
1.9 million people in automobile distribution, repair, and transportation
(2.17 million less 11 percent included in guard labour);
2.3 million people in agriculture;
5.4 million people in the health care system (6 million less 11 percent
included in guard labour);
2.5 million welfare workers;
3.5 million people in the education system;
10.16 million excess guard labour (managers and supervisors);
2 million desperate street people;
13 million students sixteen years old and older;
5 million functionally challenged;
16.5 million unpaid homemakers;
15 million unemployed (official and unofficial);
and 9 million unnecessary military and defense workers (see chapter 11).
This is a total of 80.807 million people not employed or employed
non-productively.
The 1989 labour force was approximately 125 million.13 To that we have to
add those who are not officially considered part of the labour force, such
as:
2 million street people;
13 million students;
5 million functionally challenged;
16.5 million homemakers;
and 5 million unemployed not counted in official statistics.
This gives a total of 166.5 million in the labour force of an efficiently
structured society. We allow five million between jobs (double the
unemployment rate of Japan) as normal. That leaves 161.5 million available
for work in an efficiently structured society.
There are approximately 115 million employed U.S. citizens. Of these, 19.5
million have part-time jobs working an average of three days a week, or the
equivalent of 11.7 million full-time jobs. Subtracting the phantom jobs
(19.5 million part-time workers less the 11.7 million full-time jobs) leaves
107.2 million full-time jobs. To this we must add the 7.2 million working
two jobs, for a total of 114.4 million jobs. The unnecessary jobs outlined
above that can be eliminated are:
2.047 in the insurance industry;
1.5 million in the legal industry;
1.9 million in transportation;
2.3 million in agriculture;
5.4 million in the health care system;
2.5 million welfare workers;
3.5 million in the education system;
9.009 million excess managers and supervisors (after deducting 1.151 million
already allowed in insurance, transportation, and health care;
and 9 million unnecessary military and defense workers.
This is a total of 37.156 million unnecessary jobs and 77.244 million
remaining productive jobs. At five days per week, that is 386.22 [slight
correction] million days productive work per week; which is 2.4 days work
per week of paid employment for the 161.5 million available workers.
If doubtful of any part of these calculations, study the unnecessary labour
and intercepted wealth in real estate, the stock market, banking, and
accounting, etc., as outlined in chapters 16 through 18. Also note the
savings possible if retail sales were rationalized as outlined in chapter
19. That chapter demonstrates that, for moderate-priced and high-priced
products, modern communications technology can eliminate a large share of
the 1.9 workers that are distributing for every one producing. These four
segments of the economy are only partially addressed in this first part.
Their total wasted labour is too subjective to
measure accurately, but demonstrates the potential of lowering the workweek,
in an efficient society, even further.
And this is for a throwaway society. Superfluous consumer products are sold
only because of a "created need." Direct access through communications
technology could bypass promotional/persuasive advertising, reducing impulse
buying and advertising labour.
Nor have we included the wasted labour of the United States having twice the
prisoners and parolees of other industrialized countries. Most of these
non-functional, antisocial, and criminal personalities are created from the
immense social tensions of excessive rights for some and lack of rights for
others. Some people may give up or get angry at an injustice they can sense
but cannot verbalize, others will resort to shortcuts to wealth, rights, and
power.
And as if all that is not enough to prove that the enormous efficiencies of
technology are consumed by unnecessary labour in this battle over
interception of that wealth, a study by Theodore H. Barry, a management
consulting firm, concluded that
on average, only 4.4 hours of a typical employee's
work day are used productively. About 1.2 hours are lost because of personal
and other unavoidable delays, while 2.4 hours are just "wasted." Nearly 35
percent of the wasted time is due to poor scheduling of workers; 25 percent
is due to unclear communications of assignments; and 15 percent is due to
improper staffing. The remaining "waste" is due to uncoordinated materials
handling, absenteeism, and tardiness.14
I suggest the reader study the above six paragraphs and make their own
calculation on just how little labour would be required in a society that
worked productively, that fully paid people for that work, in which work was
shared equally, and in which the goal was to maximize each person's free
time. Instead, because the efficiencies of technology are increasing at
almost an exponential rate, if that wealth is not shared - as opposed to the
current battles over it - the waste can only increase.
According to research in West Germany, DM1,000 million
invested in industrial plants would have generated two million jobs from
1955-60 and 400,000 jobs from 1960-65. From 1965-70, the same sum would have
destroyed 100,000 jobs and from 1970-75 it would have destroyed
500,000....It is work itself which tends to be abolished. According to the
paper presented by C. Rosen of the Stanford Research Institute to the March
1979 Congress of the United Auto Workers, 80 percent of the manual jobs in
the United States will be automated before the end of the century (that is
20 million of the 25 million manual jobs which now exist in the United
States). Office jobs will undergo an equally drastic reduction.15 (emphasis
added)
And to all the above can be added the reality that, when fiber-optic/satellite/computer
networks are all in place, it is anticipated that most jobs will be at home.
See footnote 4 As only 5.6 percent of automobile miles are recreational,
considering only the current mileage for recreation, this would drastically
reduce commuting time and eliminate many automobile support jobs.
The claim will be made that reducing working hours and sharing jobs without
lowering the living standards would make a country's products more expensive
and unable to compete in world trade. But every unnecessary job and welfare
payment is part of the total cost to society and that cost is reflected in
the cost of its production. Unnecessary insurance and legal or any other
costs, whether paid by business or labour, show up in the cost of
production.
Eliminating unnecessary jobs and sharing the necessary ones add no cost to
society and, to the extent that wasted capital is saved, it will be cheaper.
A society is only as productive as all of its citizens collectively. If all
Americans were productive while working five days a week they would produce
twice what they need and strip the nation's resources in the process. If
Americans were to restructure to a respectable standard of living at two and
one-half days work per week, their production could be traded equally with
any other society that was equally efficient. However, if trading with a
society that employed its labour twice as many hours and marginalized the
rest of its workers, equal trade would require costs being converted to
labour units employed per unit of production.
This is already roughly done. The governments of Sweden and New Zealand
provide substantial services to their citizens and that wealth can only come
out of production. German industrial workers are paid over 50 percent more
than their U.S. counterparts and German industry can only stay competitive
by government supports. Historically, Japan has promised lifetime employment
for their industrial workers and, while currently running at 65 percent of
capacity, the wages of the unneeded workers must be paid, one way or
another, by the consumers of that production. The European Common Market
heavily subsidizes its farmers. The United States provides its farmers with
enormous supports, and on and on with all major governments. Trading with
unequal labour values is the primary injustice in
world trade. Equalizing those labour values will
go a long way towards equal rights for all.
For those who fear these concepts, bear in mind that this philosophy opposes
one of the key aspects of communism - the distribution of all production for
free. Countries with communist economies have enormously unproductive labour,
while this treatise envisions every person being fully productive and fully
paid, the elimination of welfare for all except the truly disabled, and all
people enjoying the maximum amount of free time. In short, full rights for
all.
Restructuring to a just society, with true equal rights, would mean saved
labour, saved resources, reduced environmental
pollution, and increased free time - a very high quality of life.
| |
Save
This |
Email This |
Print This |
|
|